Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-05-12 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2003-05-12 House Journal Page 1564 HB 251 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 251 "An Act exempting certain foreign pleasure craft from the mandatory pilotage requirement." with the: Journal Page L&C RPT CS(L&C) NT 6DP 1NR 1122 FN1: ZERO(H.L&C/CED) 1122 FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 3DP 4NR 1494 FN2: (CED) 1494 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 251(FIN) "An Act relating to exemption of certain foreign pleasure craft from the mandatory pilotage requirement and to civil fines imposed on the owner or operator of a pleasure craft of foreign registry; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2003-05-12 House Journal Page 1565 Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives Berkowitz and Dahlstrom: Page 3, line 5, following "more than": Delete "173" Insert "180" Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Weyhrauch offered Amendment to Amendment No. 1. Delete "180" Insert "170" Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment to Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 251(FIN) Second Reading Amendment to Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Coghill, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Holm, Kerttula, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Fate, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Masek, Meyer, Morgan, Samuels, Whitaker, Williams, Wolf Excused: Croft, Joule, Kapsner, Kookesh Absent: Anderson, Chenault, McGuire And so, Amendment to Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. 2003-05-12 House Journal Page 1566 Representative Weyhrauch moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Weyhrauch was required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 251(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 22 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Samuels, Whitaker, Williams Nays: Crawford, Fate, Foster, Guttenberg, Holm, Kerttula, Ogg, Rokeberg, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Wilson, Wolf Excused: Croft, Joule, Kapsner, Kookesh Absent: Anderson And so, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 251(FIN) am be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. Objection was heard. CSHB 251(FIN) am will advance to third reading on tomorrow's calendar.